Mary Kay Abusing the Women It Claims to Be Helping

Written by Frosty Rose

Building schools for girls in developing countries. Saving women from domestic violence. Curing cancers that affect women. “Enriching the lives of women everywhere.” That’s the tagline of the Mary Kay Ash Foundation, and if the company says it, it must be true, right? Of course not!

In yet another attempt to whitewash its predatory practices that exploit men and women from every economic sector, but especially those who struggle most with poverty, Mary Kay set up a virtue signaling charitable foundation before virtue signaling was known as such. Now, don’t get me wrong. It’s vitally important to support domestic violence survivors and continue the hard fight against cancers of all stripes. However, if you’re looking for somewhere to donate your hard-earned money, look elsewhere.

Of course, if you’re looking for somewhere to donate your hard-earned money, you’re probably not thinking of the Mary Kay Foundation anyway. In my experience during 14 years as a consultant and director, the only people donating to this foundation are consultants themselves. Every event featured some kind of rah-rah contest that pitted consultants against each other (typical!) to see who could raise the most money for the foundation. And if you look at their website, there’s even a helpful chart about how foundation contributions are “credited,” which essentially boils down to which activities earn you a sticker on your name badge at which ridiculously overpriced event, and who gets a tax receipt—you or the organization you represent.

Consultants have been trained (though rarely in writing) to crow that the foundation donates 99 cents of every dollar it takes in directly to the charities that need it. But is that true? Again, of course not. Charity Navigator reports that in 2022, only 84% of expenditures were on programs. And if we look at 2020, it was only 76%. Compare that, just for funsies, to the American Red Cross, which spends between 90 and 91% of its money on programs, and Mary Kay just doesn’t stack up. Again.

Aside from how they choose to spend their money, how about who they are? The foundation sets itself up as a beacon of hope for survivors. But what good does it do to rescue a woman from a domestic violence situation with one hand while the other tries to recruit her into an even more abusive system with the other?

This peach of a promotion from Anastasia Szymkowski, a director in Jaime Taylor’s national area, attempts to sell overpriced packages to donate to women coming into shelters. I promise you, those women need a roof, a locking door, and maybe a hot bath. What they don’t need? Mascara and lip gloss, with a side of a recruiting pitch.

We regularly see posts on social media about women giving makeovers in domestic violence and homeless shelters. While I’m all for looking and feeling your best, these women don’t need your overpriced eyeshadow, your loser of a “business” opportunity that’s almost guaranteed to lose money, or your pity. They need a real hand-up, so stop trying to sell them Mary Kay crap.

What good does it do to build schools in an obscure village in Africa while you actively discourage women in your markets from doing any real research on your products or “business opportunity”?

 

Or label people as negative just for asking reasonable, business-minded questions? Just trust the company and your upline! Said every tyrant and dictator in known history!

If you need a real glimpse of what happens at the director level, just take a look at the lovely posts from our friend, MK sales director Ellen Bowman Cox. With every keystroke on the “private” directors-only Facebook post, she simultaneously rags on people for being negative and questioning the Almighty Company, and blasts them for not doing their own research if they dare to ask a procedural question. As my Granny would say, “Education, my foot!”

And let’s be honest, here. The only reason Mary Kay is interested in cancer research is because it’s buzzy and gives them instant goodwill points. Well, that and new lead sources, according to the regular behavior of directors and consultants. Sell a bunch of “Cancer Care” packages, take the profit AND the tax write-off, and be sure to warm chat the nurses while you’re dropping them off. And, of course, get a picture for social media cred.

In short, much like all the other pink fluff and glitter surrounding the iron fist of MLM that is Mary Kay, the foundation is mostly for show with just enough substance to throw off the unsuspecting masses.

I have told this story before on this platform, but it’s worth repeating here. I have been in two abusive relationships in my life. After escaping one, I had access to shelter if I’d needed it, free counseling, and the support and empathy of my community, as well as legal remedies available to me.

After escaping the other (I’m talking about Mary Kay, here), I was ostracized from my circle of “lifelong girlfriends.” I was in debt up to my eyeballs with a resume gap and no financial assistance available to me other than bankruptcy. I had, on the training of leaders I trusted, isolated or alienated myself from my friends and family outside the Pink Bubble. And I was subject mostly to eyerolls from the community due to my ridiculous behavior leading up to my inevitable crash.

And then I found Pink Truth, and all the pieces started to fall into place. My issues with Mary Kay were not all my fault. It wasn’t because I didn’t work hard enough. It was because the system was rigged against me, and there was just enough marketing and PR done, like through the Foundation, to pull the wool over my eyes. I pray that through this site, more eyes are opened to the damage done by Mary Kay, even when the surface looks benevolent.

Tagged:

15 COMMENTS

  1. I mean, Bernie Madoff was a well-known philanthropist who donated millions to charity while he was running his multibillion dollar Ponzi scheme.

    17
    • “Each package I sell I will give 25% to the Breast Cancer Fund at Northern Hospital…”

      Better to give directly to the hospital so they get 100%.

      “PM me for price.”

      Sheree, you will feel much better about helping the needy if you give out of your own pocket, and don’t tell the world you did it. Mary Kay foundation is just an intermediary that skims from the top of the charitable donations of others. These charities would do much better if folks donated directly. Mary Kay Foundation adds overhead cost with no added value to the receiving charity.

      Besides, you are choosing to personally profit from the charity of others. This is shameful.

      12
  2. Of note. Between the time I wrote this article and the time it was published, Mary Kay opened a new subsidiary in Vietnam. A quick Google search reveals that the average monthly wage in Vietnam for Q1 of 2024 was the equivalent of about $340 USD. With the TimeWise Repair kit clocking in at a whopping $215 plus tax, who exactly do they think they’ll be selling to? And whose lives are we enriching with this farce?

    10
    • Hi Frosty Rose.

      Thank you for the well-researched writing.
      Apparently, it is mentioned that MK’s products to be sold in Vietnam would be priced at lower cost compared to US prices but I don’t have the exact figures.
      It’s touted as “very high quality products at affordable prices” but whatever the case, you have a point there. Even if it’s priced lower, with their average wage, Vietnamese have other more pressing priorities than buying overpriced skin care and make up.

      It started with the Fortenberrys opening in Malaysia about 14 years ago. The MK products are also adjusted to make it “affordable” to the locals….. but I can vouch that it’s NOT affordable. That’s how I know it’s not affordable to the Vietnamese.

      14 years and market has reached its saturation. Consultants are dropping off like flies and now the MK has “invited” to open in Vietnam and coming soon, in Indonesia whose poverty is way, way worse than Vietnam. They have been under one corrupt government to another corrupt company.

  3. I’m currently undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer, and that care package just makes me cringe. My skin is very delicate and sensitive, and there is no way that I could use that moisturizer with all that fragrance without breaking out in a rash. All of the doctors and nurse practitioners I have seen have said the same thing…use only white, unscented skin care products. Cetaphil, Cerave, and Aveeno make good ones.

    I wouldn’t use the Satin Lips either. I’m constantly fighting against mouth sores, and the lip balm in Satin Lips just isn’t good enough, nor do my poor lips need exfoliation. Now the little keychain lip balm holder is cute. That would be a good gift with some Aquaphor Healing Ointment.

    19
  4. I’ve made my opinions on “performative charity” a little too well known in the past :D, especially regarding cancer patients and domestic violence survivors, but I’ve got to say a few words about that bleeping pink schoolhouse.

    It’s bleeping Pepto bleeping pink with a bleeping giant bleeping Mary bleeping Kay logo on the side.

    If it’s for the children, why not a nice mural of kids playing? Flowers? Animals? The name of the school? Some solid colors or designs that are the favorites of the locals?

    But at the end of the day, it’s not really about the kids, it’s “OHAI WE’RE BEING CHARITABLE OVER HERE! ADMIRE OUR CHARITABLENESS! WE’RE CHARITY-ING LIKE A MOFO OVER HERE! HAVE YOU NOTICED HOW CHARITY OUR CHARITITNG IS? HELLO IS THIS THING EVEN ON?”

    Jeez.

    15
  5. My younger sister had a very rare, aggressive ovarian cancer. So many women involved in MLMs came to me promoting products and assuring me that their products would save her life, and for her to quit the “deadly” chemo and radiation she was doing. Even after she died they hit me up to try to sell me on their products. I was so disgusted.

    I have visited domestic violence shelters as a nonprofit professional and have seen bags of MK products just sitting in their “shopping” rooms that they have.

    There are so many other ways to support women who are experiencing cancer, domestic violence, or lack of access to education. Excellent post that definitely sheds light on something that isn’t talked about enough.

    11
  6. “The Mammagropher & the Office Manager received the donations on behalf of the patients. ” More like intercepting them on the behalf of the patients. They more than likely got thrown in the trash after you left because like so many people have already stated some of those ingredients aren’t good.

    11
    • They only do testing services where she dropped them. The only patients were ones coming in for testing or consultation. If I’m getting a mammogram, I’m wanting to be in and out.

      • Somehow I think that is worse. Wouldn’t that be straight up solicitation then? I believe it would be against the rules. What are they going to do hand the first 65 women who walk through the door with a bag. No doubt there’s a business card in all those bags.

  7. I regularly donate to a homeless shelter. They don’t want any kind of products like this. I’ve donated pillows, sheets, and blankets because that’s what they need when you ask them what they need. They
    never need toiletries.

    • I’ve just started down-sizing my house in order to move in the near future and the amount of bedding I have even after my now 3 adults have moved out is extra-ordinary.

      Talking to my brother in law’s mother in law( if that makes sense!), she’s working to get homeless people off the streets and into employment. The church she works with are after business outfits for men and women, underwear and socks, household linens, children’s clothing, basic sanitary items, especially period products and diapers, somehow make-up is way down the list.

  8. For our healthcare professionals:

    Let’s say Karen Kaybot “donates” Cancer Care Packages to XYZ Cancer Center. Will the Center actually offer these MK packages to its patients? Won’t it appear that the facility is “promoting” MK products as helpful or safe?
    What if a patient has a negative reaction to a product? Can the patient/family blame the Center? What about liability?

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts